However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

On April 22, 2018, at around 14:09, the Defendants: (a) left the cre in which the surveillance of employees was neglected in light of the Franchi's G clothing No. 34 operated by the victim E in Busan Jung-gu; (b) Defendant A, who was off the victim's market price equivalent to KRW 98,00,00 in front of the store, was placed at the left hand; and (c) Defendant B, at the entrance of the store, had the above co-ship.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. E statements;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol and the statutes on the list of seizure;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 331(2) and 331(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: The grounds for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendations] The grounds for the larceny of general property [the scope of punishment] shall be taken into account: (a) the mitigated area (one to six months) of the mitigated area (one-six months), agreed with the victim not to punish [the person subject to special mitigation]; (b) there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine; (c) there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine; and (d) there is against their mistakes; and