However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Category B car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving).

On February 22, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.113% among blood transfusions, and driven it on the road of one-lane in front of the D cafeteria located in C at the Gunsan city in the military. On February 22, 2017, the Defendant turned to the left from the direction of the apartment.

At the time, the front door of the road was in the night, and the place was a three-distance without a signal, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving a motor vehicle with a safe driving by making it possible for a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle to live well on the front door and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent in driving by the victim E (63) who was driving on the right side from the left side of the running direction of the horse to the right side of the victim E (63) who was driving by the victim E (63) who was driving on the right side without thoroughly examining the boom and the right and the right in the state where the Defendant was able to boom and walk on a large amount of breath under the influence of alcohol, and was able to take the front part of the FK5 taxi as the front part of the above MT car.

As a result, the Defendant driven the said marina car in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol, and suffered injury such as salt, tension, etc. to the victim E in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim G (V, 20 years of age) who was on the said taxi in need of medical treatment for about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant, in violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), driven B Mart cars with approximately 300 meters alcohol concentration at approximately 0.113% while under the influence of alcohol on the roads of Samsung apartment, which was located in the M&A movement at the time of the time set forth in paragraph (1), from the front of Samsung apartment, which was located in the M&A movement at the time, to the front of the D cafeteria located in the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The defendant;