When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 7, 2014, the Defendant reported to the head of Gangnam-gu Office a general restaurant business with the trade name of 243.14 square meters in Seoul, Gangnam-gu, the Defendant reported the general restaurant business in the name of “D” in the name of “D” in the name of the Defendant’s mother, and then installed a studio at the above general restaurant without obtaining permission from the head of Gangnam-gu office and changed the studio to the entertainment drinking facility.

On July 22, 2014, the Defendant engaged in entertainment tavern business by combining entertainment loans, such as E (n, 26 years of age), F (n, 27 years of age), G (n, 27 years of age), and H (n, 30 years of age), on the condition that the studio grandchildren 100,000 through 190,00 won per table is paid to four general restaurants (3). From April 20, 2014 to the above date, the Defendant engaged in entertainment tavern business without permission of the competent administrative agency.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, F, H, and G;

1. Each statement of E, F, G, and H;

1. A manual of control of I;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 3 of the Food Sanitation Act and Article 37 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.