If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On February 11, 2018, at around 20:25, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the property owned by the victim, by putting the victim B (n, 69 years of age) under the direction of the Maternal Materna in the street room located in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Seoul-gu”), and by putting the Materns installed in the Materna on several occasions, thereby putting the Materns and Materns on several occasions; and (b) destroying the property that is the victim’s property so that the market price cannot be ascertained.

2. On February 11, 2018, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender by a police officer belonging to the Dongjak Police Station male branch of the Dongjak Police Station, who received a report at the same time and place as Paragraph 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act. On February 11, 2018, at around 20:45, the Defendant committed an act of disturbance revocation within the government office by 50 minutes, by putting the police officers “a frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt frightt fright

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report of a number of accidents in the police statement protocol with respect to B (verification of images);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs and suspect photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant, without any justifiable reasons, destroyed the property of the victim under each item; (b) the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime; (c) under unfavorable circumstances, the Defendant committed the crime at the time of the commission of the crime; (d) the fact that the Defendant was against the victim of the crime of destroying property; (c) the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim of the crime of destroying property was favorable circumstances; and (d) other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, details and result of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime,

The prosecution shall be dismissed.