사문서위조등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
1. Summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding person/Type unfair);
A. Fact-finding ① The document written by the defendant on October 20, 2002, which was submitted by the defendant, was not forged by the defendant, and the defendant was not guilty. ② The defendant knew that he made a provisional registration under the name of Seocho-gu Seoul KW 216.2m2m2m2m2 in Seocho-gu, Seoul, and asked I to do so, and the defendant knew that he made a provisional registration under the name of Seocho-gu, Seoul KW 216m2m2, and I did not take a provisional disposition against the above real estate for the purpose of the defendant's math, and the defendant did not take this measures. ③ The defendant, as a document outside the law, has forged each of the documents of lawsuit in this case and did not have the ability to proceed with the lawsuit in this case.
B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant's ex officio, the prosecutor shall examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant's ex officio; the prosecutor shall add "Attempted uttering of falsified Documents" to the name of the crime against the defendant for the first time in the trial; and Article 235 of the Criminal Act
2.(b)
Of the assignment of claims or the notice of assignment of claims, an application for amendments to a bill of amendment was filed with the effect that the part of the Sheet was modified as stated below, and this Court permitted the same, and both the revised facts charged and the remaining facts charged should be sentenced to one punishment in relation to concurrent crimes in the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act. Thus, the judgment of the court below cannot be maintained as they are.
Nevertheless, the defendant's argument of mistake is still subject to the judgment of this court, so it is judged first.
B. The lower court lawfully found the grounds for finding the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged.