2. The judgment of the court below seems to have led to the confession and reflect of the crime, and the victim E, L, and N'T decision of the court below seems to be a clerical error.

The punishment of this defendant was not imposed.

There is also a circumstance that the health is not good.

However, the criminal liability of the defendant is not against the law.

Many criminal records are criminal records and repeated crimes of the same kind.

The court of the court below rendered the sentence against the defendant by taking account of the aforementioned various positive and negative circumstances.

The judgment below

There is no new circumstance that can be considered in sentencing as a result of the sentence.

In addition, in full view of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, it shall not be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is not reasonable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall apply to litigation costs.