A. On July 24, 2016, at around 14:15, the Defendant mentioned the victim B ( South, 49 years old) who worked as a private teaching institute instructor for the parents of the Defendant’s private teaching institutes operated by the Defendant in the Defendant’s residence in Gosung-gun, and did not properly explain the social life (c). The Defendant erroneously employed a person who was not married to the age of 50.

Changwon’s mother was directly experienced by her mother, and Culco’s failure.

I, upon filing a lawsuit, accept the statement

(1)Before transmission of the text message, openly insult the victim;

B. Defendant B (1) on July 19, 2016, at around 16:30, the Defendant 2016, posted a phone call to E, “D driving school” parents of the victim A (hereinafter the age of 49), and thereby, damaged the victim’s reputation by publicly expressing the same false fact as that the victimized person was receiving unfair treatment, such as not paying wages to the instructors of the private teaching institute.

2) On July 21, 2016, the Defendant read the victim A by putting a phone to G, a Korean language instructor of F Private Teaching Institutes operated by the victim A at an inf place, and read the same false fact as that the victimized person publicly damaged the victim’s reputation by publicly referring to “the victim’s reputation by publicly harming the victim, by stating that “The students in the creative center have a lot of complaints to the president, and the students frequently leave from time to time, not the said person’s common interest, but the fraudulent change” did not pay wages to the instructors of the private teaching institute.

2. Determination

A. The facts charged against Defendant A constitute an offense falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. The victim is a victim of the instant case on August 17, 2017, the prosecution of the instant case.