A shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

The victim B is a person who operates the "E Park" in D at three times, and the defendant A is living in the house room of the private building for three months under the contract terms of KRW 300,000 per month.

Defendant

A around June 8, 2015, around 19:30, at the front of the “Eman Park” access road, on the ground that there was no good appraisal for the victim B (60) who is the ordinary lessor, “B, Epexe, B, and Embre,” and the victim heard that “B, Epexe, B, and Embre,” and the victim saw that “the victim would be “the hume who would not take the hume,” and the victim sustained the injury, such as the dump, tension, tension, etc., in need of two weeks of medical treatment by killing the flaps of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Each police statement made to B, F, and G;

1. A complaint;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of written diagnosis to B;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. Of the facts charged in the instant case’s defamation part, the summary of the facts charged as to Defendant A’s defamation is as shown in the Attachment. This is a crime falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, which is a crime of non-compliance with the intent of a victim under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, since the victim B submitted a written agreement stating that he/she would not want punishment against the above Defendant after the institution of the instant indictment, this part of the indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

2. The summary of the facts charged in this case against Defendant B is as shown in the separate sheet. This is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which is a crime of non-compliance with intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victims do not want punishment against the above Defendant after the institution of the instant indictment.