The Defendant became aware of the fact that electric wires are stored at the construction site of the Republic of Korea, for up to two weeks at the construction site of the Republic of Korea-U.S., the Defendant planned to steals the said electric wires, and prepared a siren and a cutting machine in advance.

1. Around January 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the thief, on the string of a string-type car in advance, on January 5, 2016, 2016, on the string-type car, on the string-type car at the construction site; (b) opened a lock to return the lock password, which was left at the construction site at the above construction site; and (c) entered the said construction site; and (d) opened a wire 1,140 meters at the market price of the victim F Co., Ltd., Ltd. in the said site; and (d) continued to cut the said vehicle loaded on the said vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. On March 5, 2016, the Defendant brought about 1,370 meters of electric wires equivalent to KRW 25 million at the market price of the said victim’s possession in the same manner as the described in the preceding port at around 02:00, in the place described in the preceding port, around March 5, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G or H;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (verification of the rental car agreement and the identity of the suspect), siren car agreement, and the location map of vehicle GPS to photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The defendant's reasons for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the aggravation of concurrent crimes are that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant in agreement with the victim is favorable to the defendant.

Although the defendant was not in the same kind, he committed each of the crimes of this case during the suspension period, and the criminal records of the defendant's same crime are disadvantageous to the defendant.

Other punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking comprehensive account of the age, environment, etc. of the accused.