On December 1, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Defense at the Jeju District Court, which was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on May 9, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 21, 2015, which was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 22, 2015.

On June 201, the Defendant: (a) around 100, to the victim C, a landscaped business operator, in Scenk Sck-si, “Sck storage and D hotel remodeling projects ordered by the Government of Scenk-si; (b) the landscaping project of capital of KRW 1 billion is defective at the rate of 3:7 percent from Uzbekistan, along with the landscaping project of KRW 1 billion in capital. First of all, the Defendant used the storage and hotel remodeling project in progress within the main area; (c) the costs of the hotel remodeling project; (d) all investment in the landscaping project as the cost of the hotel remodeling project is paid KRW 1 billion from the head of the order office of the hotel construction; and (d) the principal will be fully repaid even if the hotel fails.

“.....”

However, there is little possibility that the defendant would receive construction by entering into a regular contract with Embcccccccck for sample of two rooms only, and if the progress occurred, it would allow Emccock Group to participate in the construction under the agreement that he would make repayment by the end of June 2011. On January 201, 201, even if he receives money from the injured party due to poor financial reasons, such as office rent and management expenses, which are not paid for each month, even if he receives money from the injured party due to such poor financial reasons as Emccck and Ecck's business, the amount of money is equivalent to the amount of money, including the agreement fee for the case of violation of private law, defense counsel fee for the case of violation of law, which was being tried at the time of repayment, and the amount of money has been paid by the owner of the hotel and continued to receive or have received the profits from the owner of the hotel project.