However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 03:00 on June 15, 2012, the Defendant was aware that the Defendant was able to teach with the victim B (year 22), and the Defendant was able to find it as the victim’s studio in Gangseo-si C and 201 on the ground that he was able to receive a corner and disregarded horse call, and the Defendant confirmed the absence of any person, and invaded the window of the hallway toilet with the hallway toilet that was not opened at studio.

2. The Defendant: (a) intruded the victim’s measures, such as the time and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph, at the same time and place as that of the preceding paragraph; (b) reported that the clothes, etc. of women’s friends were on the floor of the room; (c) collected excessive amount of money that was installed on the surface of the wall; and (d) opened a gas valve, thereby causing danger to human life, body, or property by gas leakage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 172-2 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intrusion upon residence and the choice of imprisonment) of the choice of criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the maximum term of two crimes is aggregated);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is an intrusion upon the victim’s residence and cutting gas to cut the gas, and thus, the crime of this case causes the risk of causing the loss of human life and the severe damage to property due to fire or explosion. The crime of this case is not good.

However, the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in a contingent manner, and opened a gas valve.