2. The fact that the Defendant appears to reflect on the judgment, that the amount of damage was not significant, and that the court below compensated for and agreed on the damage to the victim. However, these points were already considered in the court below, even though the Defendant had been sentenced three times due to the same kind of crime, re-offendered despite the fact that the nature of the crime was poor in light of the method of the crime, and all the sentencing conditions of the instant records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime, do not seem to be too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.