근저당권말소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the court stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance that “(2)” Nos. 3, 14, and 16 of the 3rd to 16th of the 2011 was prepared, and the Defendant concluded a debt collection delegation contract with consideration credit information to urge D to repay the debt, and thus the extinctive prescription was suspended; (b) the period of extinctive prescription is five years since the secured debt of the 1rd mortgage is a debt of the Defendant and D; and (c) the Defendant concluded a credit information and debt collection delegation contract with consideration credit information and debt collection delegation contract with D to the effect that the extinctive prescription period of the 1rd mortgage was suspended by urging D to repay the debt to D; and (d) the first instance court’s inquiry as to the “credit information” No. 413 or 414 of the 2015th of the 4rd of the 11st 2015.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.