Defendant

The defendant A and the defendant B are one's own paper.

1. On September 19, 2013, from around 23:45 to 00:50 on the following day, Defendant A suffered bodily injury, such as two parts, which require two weeks of treatment, when Defendant A was able to take the head of the victim B, who is a woman living together with her mother, due to the fluence of the fluor’s history and the fluor’s property issues from the dwelling space in the family located in the Ycheon-gun-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, and due to the flusium and the flusium property issues

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 1, suffered bodily injury, such as the impairment of the sprinke and the sprinke of the victim’s head and the floor of the living room. Defendant B, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph 1, suffered bodily injury to the sprinke and the sprinke in need of three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of the police interrogation of the accused (including the substitution of the accused);

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. Reporting on internal affairs;

1. A report on investigation (Attachment of a field photograph);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (Attachment of a medical certificate for injury);

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine for Negligence);

1. The type to be suspended;

(a) Defendant A: Fines of 500,000 won (one hundred thousand won per day);

(b) Defendant B: Fines of 700,000 won (one hundred thousand won per day)

1. The Defendants of suspended sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendants are not subject to criminal punishment, compromise with each other and not subject to criminal punishment, and the Defendants appear to have made a remarkable progress in light of the fact that the Defendants would not be able to commit the same mistake again and that they would not