However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 1, 2016, at around 02:50, the Defendant: (a) completed the 1112 report on the assault case at the front of the C cafeteria located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) stated the “F” column of the “name” of the voluntary accompanying signature presented by the aforementioned E as if he/she was his/her punishment F; (c) forged the document of voluntary accompanying signature stating the signature of the “F” as above, and exercised it as if he/she had a genuine signature on that document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Voluntary accompanying report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 239 of the Criminal Act on the crime) and Article 239 (2) and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act on the crime (the point of exercising the above investigation signature);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that the criminal defendant is prognating his mistake in depth, and the fact that the criminal defendant surrenders to the investigative agency for a long time after committing the instant crime);