2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Plaintiffs G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”)’s seizure of investment certificates against the Construction Mutual Aid Association of the Plaintiffs G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Co., Ltd”) was ordered by the public of G to seize “The obligation to return upon withdrawal of the association members based on the investment shares held by G to the Construction Mutual Aid Association” on July 18, 2012, with the debtor G and the third debtor’s construction mutual aid association as well as the claim amount as KRW 220,168,767 on July 23, 2012. The above seizure order was served on the Construction Mutual Aid Association on July 23, 2012.

B, C, D, and E (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff A, etc.”) filed a lawsuit seeking the payment of unpaid wages amounting to G from April 1, 2012 to May 31, 2012 (or June 1, 2012), with respect to the unpaid wages claim (Plaintiff A6,450,00, Plaintiff B4,960,000, Plaintiff C5,160,000, Plaintiff D2,880,000, Plaintiff E4,160,000, and Plaintiff E4,160,000, against G on November 8, 2012. The above court rendered a final judgment of the court below and rendered a final judgment of the Plaintiff on January 21, 2013, and rendered a final judgment of the court below.

Based on the record, on November 29, 2012, G and third debtors were ordered to make a provisional attachment on the “investment securities held by G to construction mutual aid associations” by the Daegu District Court 2012Kadan9662 with the amount of the above unpaid wages, and the provisional attachment order was served on the Construction mutual aid associations on December 3, 2012.

B. The Defendant’s seizure and enforcement of investment certificates against G Construction Mutual Aid Association (i.e., the Defendant’s seizure and enforcement of investment certificates by a notary public against G is based on the No. 166 of a certificate of fair and comprehensive law office document of law firm, and the Defendant G’s debtor on August 24, 2012.