except that this judgment.

On August 3, 2015, at around 02:10, the Defendants reported that there was noise from fighting in the workplace of Defendant B, which was located within the 302 Singu, Busan House E-dong, and tried to verify the circumstances of Defendant B’s schill G belonging to the Felon Police Station of Busan, which was called out after having received a report that there was noise from fighting, and that Defendant A passed the head, and Defendant A entered the house of this case, “I want to see that I want to see that I would come to the house of this case, I would like to see, “I would like to see that I would come to the house of this case,” and “I would like to see the face of the above Hah on a two-hand hand and walk the Hah face of the Hah on a one-time basis, and that I would like to see the Hah on the Hah of the Hahon, and Defendant B would have come to the Hah on the Hah.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement of H and G;

1. Application of the investigation report (No. 4) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions on criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and Articles 136(1) and 30 (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act; Defendant A

1. Defendant C at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A and B of suspended execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448, Apr. 1, 201);