However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. In fact, on February 1, 2008, the Defendant was a daily worker at the construction site of the Jindo passenger ship terminal located at the construction site of the Jindo-dong, Jindo-gu, Changwon-si, who was working at the construction site and received industrial disaster benefits, such as the suspension of business and the receipt of treatment expenses, etc. from the original branch of the Labor Welfare Corporation on August 30, 2008. On August 30, 2008, the Defendant applied for the suspension of the execution of his/her imprisonment with prison labor for the industrial accident at the site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the Jindo-gu-gu, Jindo-si, Seoul (the first floor of the extension site of the construction site of the passenger ship of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the Jindo-si, and the Defendant applied for the suspension of the execution of his/her imprisonment with prison labor for up to 20 years in the name of the two-month.

2. On September 12, 2008, the Defendant stated that “C” in the column of the disaster subject to the application for medical care benefits, “A” in the column of the disaster occurrence date, “In order to remove the 1st floor of underground top wall mar in the construction site, the disaster subject to the construction site,” and submitted the column to the person in charge of the disaster, stating that “In order to remove the marization of the 1st floor of underground surface in the construction site, the disaster subject to the removal of the wall mar in the upper part of the retaining wall and the wall mar in the course of the removal of the wall mar house, the Defendant fells into the ground of the soil floor of the first floor of underground floor and submitted it to the person in charge of the disaster” respectively.

However, the fact was that the defendant, not C, was the person suffering from the industrial accident, so the application for the medical care benefits submitted as above was false for the benefit of industrial accident.

As such, the Defendant, in collusion with C, deceivings employees of the Victim Labor Welfare Service to take charge of the Victim Labor Welfare Service, and thereby, suspended the business due to industrial accidents from the account under C on November 20, 208.