2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and expressed against himself/herself, the fact that he/she agreed with the victim, and the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine is favorable to the defendant. However, there is no reason to consider the motive of the crime of this case as the defendant committed the crime of this case under the influence of alcohol. When the defendant was absent at a trial several times after the crime of this case, he/she was detained by the detention warrant, he/she recovered the damage. The defendant was served with the indictment and a writ of summons, and the court was served with the summons, and the defendant was detained twice as he/she did not respond to several times without any reasonable reason, and there was a number of other criminal records, and there are many other criminal records, such as the defendant's age, sex, criminal behavior, home environment, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the means and consequence of the crime, and the result of the application of sentencing guidelines and sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court committee before and after the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.