Provided, That each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A

A. On January 11, 2013, the Defendant, in violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collective intimidation, deadly weapons, etc.) said that, “E” in the operation and management of the Defendant in the Hah Chang-gun, the victims were forced to take advantage of the victim B (the age of 47), F (the age of 47) and the obligation and obligation of the Defendant, while the victims were forced to take advantage of a deadly weapon (the age of 13cm in the blade length, the total length of 25cc in the office of the Defendant), the victims were forced to take advantage of the victims, and “I mara, kn, knick.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened victims by carrying a deadly weapon.

B. At around 03:00 on January 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed that “the victim I (the 49 years of age), an employee of the convenience store, who was suffering from the two-time credit rating before the “H shop” in the operation of the Defendant in the Jeon Chang-gun of North Korea, would be one time to complete the Defendant’s death; (b) 4 times the part of the victim’s neck, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment; and (c) caused the victim’s injury by hand.

2. On January 11, 2013, at around 15:08, the Defendant: (a) deducteds the victim A (the age of 48) from excessive points cited as the same background as the description in paragraph (a) of Article 1; (b) and (c) continued to go back to knife by the Defendant; (d) the victim ran away from the victim’s back to knife; and (e) the victim ma, which is a dangerous object from the manife, flife, flife three times to flife the victim’s head, flife the beer’s back to flife; and (d) the victim flife the beer’s back to flife with flifeer’s back to flife, and flife the flife’s back to flife.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. The police;