성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for four months and confiscation) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.
2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized his mistake and reflecteds his mistake, and that the agreement seems to have been submitted to the investigation agency by the unanimous agreement with TW as an employee of the victim N, is favorable to the defendant.
However, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have much social harm by commercializing women's sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and requires a simple and strict punishment to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being committed during the period of repeated offense. The defendant's act of arranging sexual traffic constitutes each of the crimes of this case without being committed during the period of repeated offense. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court Sentencing Commission, Type 2 of the sexual traffic crime of 19 years or older (mediation of sexual traffic by taking advantage of business and giving and receiving, etc.), the decision in the recommended sphere, the scope of the recommended sentence (basic sphere), and other factors of sentencing stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and result before and after the crime, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per
(However, the judgment of the court below's prior convictions "1............, the summary of evidence" in the judgment below is "2.1..................... the report of investigation report and confirmation of repeated crime:..............", "1. concurrent crimes" in "the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act," and "the following crimes..