If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 03:30 on September 5, 2016, the Defendant assaulted E (the age of 27) at the main point of “C” located in P, a police officer belonging to the D District District of the Pakistan Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report of assault, by causing the Defendant’s fighting of the Defendant’s fighting, seated on the floor of the horse, and was able to do so. While putting the above E in a bath, the Defendant committed assault, such as flabing the flab of the said E, and blabing it behind.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on crime prevention and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of investigation reports (on-site CCTV verification), CCTV-faging photographs and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is poor, but there is no criminal record against the defendant, depth and reflects the defendant, and other various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the following factors: