성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
On October 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) known the control police officer as a male guest, received cash of 60,000 won from the control police officer; (b) provided guidance to E Inn's accommodation 201; and (c) arranged sexual traffic so that sexual traffic will be conducted with F. and sexual intercourse.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Legal statement of witness G;
1. A written statement;
1. Application of statutes on site photographs;
1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (1) 1 of the same Act;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The defendant's argument regarding the defendant's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order does not have good offices for usual sexual traffic. The defendant asserts that since the police officer's refusal of a police officer's request at the time of crackdown led to female workers without any choice by actively and simply demanding it, this constitutes a type of crime-causing vessel investigation, and the procedure for prosecution based on such vessel investigation is invalid in violation of the provisions of the law.
However, in light of the following circumstances revealed according to the evidence in the judgment, i.e., ① nearby accommodation establishments in which the defendant operated at Pyeongtaek Police was engaged in commercial sex acts; ② accordingly, the police officer controlled the degree of 4ths of nearby accommodation, including the defendant’s operational lodging; ③ the police officer asked the defendant about whether he/she was in a carper; ③ the police officer immediately asked the defendant about whether he/she was in a carper; and accordingly, the police officer paid 60,000 won in total and 201 won in order to provide him/her with an opportunity to commit a crime; thus, it is reasonable to deem that the ship investigation in the instant case is legitimate, since the defendant’s assertion is not accepted.