In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

1. Defendant A, at around 00:00 on January 4, 2017, found one of the LG V10 smartphones equivalent to KRW 500,000,000 in the victim D taxi driven by the Defendant, and did not follow the procedure, such as returning it to the victim, and embezzled the property that he/she left the Defendant’s possession.

2. Defendant B, at around 17:00 on January 10, 2017, he/she would sell it to another person with the knowledge that at A’s house located in Bupyeong-si E and two stories, the Defendant would sell it with the knowledge that the Defendant is a stolen of the Victim D’s LGV10 smartphone.

At the same time, the stolen was kept in custody.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A statement of victims in connection with the preparation of D;

1. A statement of reference witnesses prepared in the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (referring to statements by witnesses and damage-related articles);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 360(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 362(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act