beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.06.12 2019고단6812

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 19:15 on October 3, 2019, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported that the Defendant was asserting a dispute between the Defendant and the Defendant’s living partner in the Heung-gu B apartment C; (b) and (c) her own security guard E entering the house, who was sent back after having received a report of 112, she took a bath to him; (d) her hand carried his chest and shoulder by hand, her chest and shoulder by hand, and her her f was pushed by her finger’s hand; and (e) her her f was assaulted by F with the Defendant’s ppuri’s hand, her f was hicking, pling, plucking, etc., with the Defendant’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement of the witness F, E's respective legal statements F, and E;

1. The defendant did not have committed any assault against the police officer. However, this court denied the facts charged. However, considering the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court: (i) F and E sent the defendant to the apartment house in which the defendant was reported to assault G from the investigative agency to this court to the investigation agency, and (ii) the defendant sent him to the apartment house in which he was reported to assault G, and (iii) he should have to search for the items carried by G; and (iv) the defendant tried to carry out a police box along with G, and even if the defendant was given several warnings during his restraint, each consistently stated to the effect that he was arrested as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of performance of official duties by exercising physical power to F and E; and (v) F and E were the persons working as police officers, and even if F and E did not receive any assault from the defendant, the defendant did not appear to have committed any unlawful arrest of the act of obstruction of performance of official duties as a police officer and gave any false testimony to the defendant.