When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. From around 01:00 on August 13, 2017 to 02:40 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main business by drinking at the main point of “D” in the operation of the victim C (n, 53 years of age) located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, and drinking, “I have to know who would have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have so,” “I have to talked, I have to be able to talk, and the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main business by force.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) at the date and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) at the victim C’s market price equivalent to 74,000 won in total; (c) and (d) he did not pay a set of values without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 3(1)39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with business), and Article 3(1)39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the aggregate of the amounts of the above two crimes) shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;