However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 27, 2016, at around 05:21, 201, the Defendant intruded the victim C'D' managed by the victim C in Chungcheongnam-si B before the extreme fall, and cited a 800,000 won of the market price, which includes approximately KRW 1.50,000 of the cash owned by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building managed by the victim at night, and stolen the victim's property.

2. On May 13, 2016, at around 22:00, the Defendant used a small credit cooperative consisting of KRW 141,040,00 in total, including 1,50,000 (NEX7 digital camera) and 4,5,000 (1,50,000 won (154,50 won), 154,50 won (1,000 won), 21,10 won (1,000 won), 141,000 won (141,000 won) and 1,50 won (141,040 won) and 9 won (1,041,000 won).

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building managed by the victim at night, and stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement in F and C;

1. Each investigation report and each internal investigation report;

1. Each photograph and each CCTV photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning specification of transactions;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act: The following circumstances and the defendant’s age, character and conduct, circumstances, and circumstances where the crime of this case was committed repeatedly at a short time: The defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case; the damage caused by the crime of this case is not relatively significant and completely recovered; the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant;