2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

이에 원고가 피고를 제지하자, 피고는 원고에게 비아냥거리며 의도적으로 성적인 모멸을 하기 위해 “너 정관수술 했다며 ”라는 발언을 하면서 원고를 조롱하였고, 이어 “너 좆대가리 짤랐냐 , 너 씨 없지 , 하나님이 그걸 왜 줬겠냐 , 그걸 왜 짜르니 ”라며 공개적으로 성적 비하의 발언을 하며 원고를 모욕하였다.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages suffered by the above insult.

2. In the court of Suwon District Court Decision 121 delivered on October 8, 2015, where the date for the first pleading of the appeal of this case was open to the court of appeal of this case, the original defendant decided to withdraw the appeal of this case on the condition that the defendant is aware of the Plaintiff; the defendant raised a apology to the Plaintiff; the defendant divided the Plaintiff by the number of maliciouss, and the fact that the plaintiff decided to withdraw the appeal of this case, and the fact that the plaintiff decided to withdraw the appeal of this case, is without dispute between the parties, so long as the plaintiff agreed with the defendant to withdraw the appeal of this case, there is no interest in the appeal

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 81Da1312, Mar. 9, 1982). The Plaintiff asserted that, in light of the Defendant’s speech and behavior after the first day of pleading, the Plaintiff did not withdraw the appeal of this case by deeming that the Plaintiff was not genuine, but did not withdraw the appeal of this case (the above assertion is decided to the effect that the agreement on withdrawal of the appeal is revoked by mistake under Articles 109 and 110 (Declaration of Intention by Mistake) of the Civil Act). However, at the time of the agreement on withdrawal of the appeal, the Plaintiff was not genuine.

The plaintiff's above assertion is without merit, since there is no sufficient evidence to support the defendant's deception of the plaintiff.

The plaintiff shall have the interest in the appeal.