beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.10 2016가합32112

공사대금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 896,50,000 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from June 16, 2015 to January 10, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant signed the instant contract and the modified contract

From the perspective of “the instant construction work” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction work”) the “stoves production works of 9,10 s to the stoves production of the

After being awarded a contract, on September 26, 2012, between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on September 26, 2012, the parts for the duct production (Duct) of the boiler 9, 10, for the support of virtue, and for the assembly of virtue and lines (hereinafter referred to as the “instant virtue, etc.”).

(C) the purchase agreement to be supplied not later than July 31, 2013 on the supply amount of KRW 8,150,000,000 (excluding value-added tax) (hereinafter referred to as “instant agreement”).

(2) On March 12, 2014, the Defendant concluded a modified contract with the content that the Plaintiff would immediately produce and deliver part of the virtue that is expected to be supplied with respect to the instant contract in the form of brox Mole, and that the supply amount is KRW 8,970,00,000 (excluding value-added tax), and that the delivery date is changed to December 31, 2014 (hereinafter “the first modified contract”).

3) As to the instant contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on July 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) additionally supplies blox Assembly 359 tons and 364 tons of blox sembly; (b) changes the supply amount to KRW 9,400,000 (excluding value-added tax); and (c) changes to the supply date to December 31, 2014 (hereinafter “the second amendment contract of this case”).

B. (B) The criteria for the range of error of each of the subject matter of the instant contract were designed at the same five meters.

2. On June 25, 2013, the Plaintiff requested on June 25, 2013 that “In the case of construction in accordance with the existing drawing, it is difficult to comply with 5m standard of the margin of error in the virtue, and thus, the Plaintiff’s request to review how to increase the quantity of reinforcement materials to meet the above standard

Accordingly, Defendant A employee of the Republic of Korea on July 10, 2013 to Plaintiff B.