When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant, as the husband of the victim B (here, 43 years old) building, has a dispute over the problem of return of security deposit with the husband of the victim.

피고인은 2016. 1. 16. 18:00 경 김해시 C, 피해자가 운영하는 `D` 미용실에서 피해자의 남편에게 전세금을 돌려받기 위해 찾아 갔으나 피해자의 남편이 없자 피해자에게 “ 신랑 어 딨 노, 왜 돈을 안내 주요, 휘발유 가져와 미용실에 불 질러 버릴까, 가게 영업 못하게 해 버릴까, 월요일에 다시 와서 불 지른다.

“The victim reported to the police,” and said, “the victim again said that “the victim is a fluorous fluor, fluorian, fluorian, fluorian, and fluoral fluor, if the report is filed with the police station on the fluoral fluor, fluoral fluor,” and “the fluoral fluor, if the report is filed with the police station.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports (including image CDs and photographs attached thereto at the time, and photographs attached thereto);

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the confession and reflect of the Defendant, and the Defendant’s failure to return the security deposit from the husband of the victim, taking into account various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of the instant case before and after the instant crime.