게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one million won in penalty) is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. The Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime resulting from fraud, etc.
In addition to the instant crime, an unregistered game machine was installed in a place other than the instant crime.
However, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant reflects the instant crime in depth; (b) the Defendant has already been sentenced to a fine by committing another identical type of crime committed at the time close to the date and time of the instant crime; (c) the Defendant has been subject to a repeated crime; and (d) the Defendant is suffering from brain death; and (c) the Defendant appears to have not good health conditions, such as the background of the instant crime; (d) the circumstances following the instant crime; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment; and (e) other various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant argument, such as the background of the instant crime; (e)
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.