The Defendant appeared and testified as a witness of the Defendant’s case of violation of the Narcotics Control Act against Defendant B, No. 1072, 1107, at the Changwon District Court 202, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, 303 on December 20, 2016, when the Defendant appeared in and testified as a witness of the Defendant’s case of violation of the said Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. against Defendant B, the fact is even though he did not know of the fact that the Defendant had been involved in the process of administering the clopon, from September 26, 2016 to October 5, 2016, the Defendant found that the copon was dilution with the Defendant’s dilution with the copon which was dilution with the above copon at the office around September 2016.

“Along with the purpose of this Act,” a false representation was presented.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of each court record, a copy of recording notes, a copy of the evidence list, and a copy of the total list of seized articles;

1. A copy of the 112 reported case processing list, copy of the seizure report, copy of the report on the results of preliminary experiment for narcotics, copy of each narcotics appraisal report, copy of each police report on E, or copy of each police report on B mobile communications;

1. Details of sending mobile communications to the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to record recording of unmanned meetings;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act with respect to the crime;

1. The measure of recommending the application of the sentencing criteria: A confession made between January and October (the area of mitigation):

2. In this case, the sentence of sentence was rendered by the defendant intentionally perjury in order that the defendant would be exempted from punishment for narcotics crimes B.

Perjury is a country of discovery of substantial truth in a criminal trial.