beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.08 2018고단5403

공문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2012, the Defendant: (a) requested a nameless person who became aware of via the Internet to forge a doctor’s license stating the Defendant’s personal information and a source receipt of earned income; (b) sent the Defendant’s name, resident registration number, photograph, etc. via e-mail; and (c) requested the de facto person to enter “B”, “A”, “C”, “B”, “B”, and “B”, and “B.12.” in the column of the person liable to collect the source receipt of earned income in the form of receipt of earned income, the Defendant paid the Defendant’s name and registration number, “A,” and “I” from each of the above persons on the Do’s license number on which the official seal of the head of health and welfare family is affixed; and (d) received the above KRW 40 from each of the above persons on the Do’s license; and (d) paid the above amount of earned income in the column of the person liable to collect the source receipt of earned income.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with a name-free person, placed one doctor's license for the Defendant under the name of the Minister of Health and Welfare Family, a public document for the purpose of exercising his/her duties, and placed the source receipt for wage and salary income in the name of D subject to imposition, which is a private document on the proof of fact.

2. Around September 7, 2012, the Defendant filed an application for a department store card in the name book of I department stores located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and exercised a forged doctor’s license and a receipt for collecting wage and salary income as stated in paragraph (1) as if they were duly formed with the staff in charge of issuing the card who knew of the forgery.

3. The Defendant filed an application for the department store card, such as Paragraph 2, at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, and was committed on the part of the victim J Co., Ltd. as if he were the intention of high-income.

However, the facts are.