beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.06.18 2013고단803

공갈미수

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Around July 26, 2010, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the victim E and the victim F, a person holding the resale right at the office of licensed real estate agents operated by the victim C and D, but the victim C et al. entered into an investigation with the victim C et al. to the effect that the victim C et al. suffered damage by entering into a contract with the victim C et al. to the effect that the above commercial building did not have any business feasibility, such as not a store eligible for support from the SH Corporation but a hospital et al. moved in and did not carry out business activation.

1. On March 26, 2012, the Defendant sent content-certified mail to the K Licensed Real Estate Agent Office of G building Y-9023, on seven persons, such as the victim D, C, H, E, E, I, F, and J, at the above place.

In the above content-certified mail, the Defendant submitted a written complaint to the prosecutor's office to compensate for losses caused by a lessee's violation of the real estate lease contract brokerage and the notification before the tax office and the competent Gu office's legal measures to the effect that "if the amount requested for compensation is not more than 156 million won, the Defendant shall submit a written complaint to the prosecutor's office for fraud, violation of the Real Estate Brokerage Act, etc., and the tax office shall file a complaint against the suspicion of tax evasion of acquisition tax and capital gains tax, and the Gu office shall submit a civil petition against the cancellation of the certificate of an intermediary and the suspension of business against the act of unregistered brokerage, and shall be punished by submitting a written complaint against the act of unregistered brokerage." However, the Defendant attempted to receive KRW 156 million from the food victims, but failed to

2. On February 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) filed a complaint with the National Tax Service to the victim’s cell phone at the same place; and (b) filed a complaint with the National Tax Service to investigate the head of the Tong and his family’s cash flow; and (c) notified the Gu office thereof to cancel the certificate of qualification