물품대금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for a dismissal or an additional determination as to the defendant's assertion in this court, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence
2. Parts used or added;
A. On September 10, 2015, “ September 10, 2015” in the second seven pages of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed “ around June 2015.”
B. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Plaintiff cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim on September 2, 2015, since the transaction was not conducted which caused the Plaintiff’s tax invoice, which is the basis of the instant claim.
The Plaintiff issued a tax invoice of KRW 54,390,00 for supply price of KRW 54,439,00 for the Defendant on September 2, 2015, and KRW 59,829,00 for the total amount of KRW 59,829,00 for the Defendant. According to the overall purport of each entry and pleading with evidence Nos. 3 and 10 for the above stone price prior to the issuance of the tax invoice, the time when the Defendant issued the final tax invoice to the Plaintiff on May 4, 2015. The details of transactions (Evidence No. 3, hereinafter referred to as the “standard Foundation request”) submitted by the Plaintiff and the Defendant on May 18, 2015, and around May 20, 2015, the Plaintiff appears to have traded multiple number of building stones compared to the quantity of building stones supplied to the Defendant on May 20, 2016. The court of first instance issued an order of KRW 17,000 for each of the above items to be supplied.