For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the charge of interference with business among the facts charged in the instant case on the ground that there was no proof of the relevant crime.

In light of the records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “business” in the crime of interference with business as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but the guilty part does not indicate the grounds of objection against the petition of appeal or the reasoning of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.