However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On February 2013, the Defendant forged a private document by means of a blank computer in the PC room located in the PC room located in the Kunpo-si, Ma, the debtor D, resident registration number, Ma, the debtor’s address, and the debtor shall transfer the borrowed amount of KRW 100 million to a bank account designated by G by the creditor G by December 20, 2012. The debtor, on February 13, 2010, stated that “the borrowed amount of KRW 804,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00

2. On February 18, 2013, the Defendant submitted an application for provisional seizure to the pertinent employee at the Suwon District Court’s branch office, which was located in Ansan-si, and issued a forged D’s loan certificate as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The loan certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written application for provisional seizure and provisional seizure;

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the occupation of a private document and the choice of imprisonment), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of exercising the private investigation document and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is against the defendant's wrong recognition, the defendant is currently visually handicapped, and the circumstances,