상해등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. Of the judgment below of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal, the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim C, and even though there was no intention to interfere with each business of the victims, the court below found the defendant guilty of each part of the charges, which is erroneous in the misapprehension of the legal principles.
2. The judgment of the court below stated to the effect that: (a) circumstances acknowledged by the court below and evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, such as the legal statement of the court below of the court below of the first instance and the court of the first instance; (b) G, H, and J’s respective legal statement of the court below; (c) K and L’s investigative agency statements and investigation reports (including photographs attached thereto); and (d) the victim’s injury to C, in particular, the victim made a detailed statement; and (e) I at the scene of the trial stated in the court of the first instance that “I witness physical fighting between the defendant and the victim and stated that I would immediately take the victim’s injury.” Even after the victim’s photograph (Evidence No. 83 of evidence record), the victim’s oral e.g., the victim’s act of assault committed by the defendant at the time of the second time after the month, the victim’s act of assault was conducted by the victim’s disciplinary committee; and (b) the victim’s act was conducted during the second time more than the victim’s disciplinary action or the victim’s act.