beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.08.27 2015구합58959

영업정지처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

A. The former Framework Act on the Construction Industry (hereinafter “former Framework Act on the Construction Industry”)

(2) The Plaintiff filed a report on capital for 2012 (as of December 31, 2012) which constitutes the registration criteria with the Korea Construction Association on September 2, 2013 under Articles 9(4) and 91(3)1, 2014 (as of December 31, 2012). The Korea Construction Association, on September 9, 2013, notified the Defendant of the following facts: The Plaintiff’s total amount of 5 billion won (as of 687,861, 435 won): 50,70,625 won, loans (as of 179,912,00), 20,000 won, 30,000 won, 20,000 won, 30,000,000 won, 20,000 won, 306,06,000 won, 306,000 won, 25,000 won.

E) On June 25, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal seeking revocation of the instant disposition with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but the said commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s said claim on February 13, 2015. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap’s 1, 2, and Eul’s 1 through 5, and the purport of the entire pleadings.]

2. This.