However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the representative director of the FF farming association, and G is the person who operates H.

Around March 2011, in the 2011-201-201-201-20000, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport decided to grant subsidies of the total amount of KRW 75 million from the Livestock Development Fund (State expenses), Do expenses, and Gun expenses to the agricultural partnership selected as a subsidized project operator.

An agricultural partnership for such selection as a subsidy program operator must have the ability to bear the portion exceeding the subsidy out of the total project cost (hereinafter referred to as “self-payment”). A subsidy program operator shall preferentially execute the self-payment prior to the receipt of the subsidy in order to actually receive the subsidy. A subsidy operator shall faithfully perform the subsidy program with the care of a good manager in accordance with the statutes, the purpose of granting the subsidy, the details and conditions of the subsidy program, and shall not engage in any unfair conduct related to the subsidy, and the subsidy operator shall jointly use the agricultural machinery purchased with the subsidy to the members of the corporation and shall not privateize the agricultural machinery.

On March 201, the Defendant conspired with G, in relation to the H office operated by G in 2011, which took place in the 201-201 research fee-generating management body equipment support project in the 2011-201 Sincheon-gun, Cheongcheon-gun, Cheongcheon-do, the Defendant transferred the money to G, and the Defendant immediately remitted the money to the account designated by the Defendant, and made a false statement of the money with the name “on the passbook prior to the Defendant’s own account prior to the execution of the purchase price of the agricultural machinery,” and intended to obtain the subsidy by applying for the payment of the subsidy.

On March 23, 2011, the Defendant invested in the office located in the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of