beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.02.19 2014고단165

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence1 to 37 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The fraud is a single cash withdrawal scheme of the so-called telephone financial fraud (tentatively referred to as “defishing”) organization that takes money by deceiving a large number of unspecified persons in Korea to the public prosecutor’s office, loan company, etc., and by misrepresenting them to the effect that “the bank is being created and used”, “the credit rating shall be raised, stamp, guarantee insurance premium, etc. to receive a loan,” and making the victims transfer money to the bank account by deceiving the victims to the bank account, notifying the Internet banking’s security card number and authentication number, and using it to transfer money from the bank account.

On November 2013, the Defendant received 15 to 200,000 won per day from the chief of the Dong-gu C Office, who was instructed by a person who was not killed in the name of the senior police officer, who was a senior policeman, and inspected whether the above large passbook account can be used, and offered money transferred to the account by cash withdrawal method as above in order with the above officers to take charge of account transfer or withdrawal.

On December 2, 2013, the Defendant conspireds with the conciliation staff in the same order as above, and on the contrary, on the following occasions, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, stating that “SB I Savings Bank E will make a loan up to 20 million won if it is sent 1.5 million won under the name of deposit money, etc.,” and the Defendant withdrawn the money deposited by the victim by the bank account in the name of the Defendant and deposited the money into the corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant.

As can be seen, the Defendant, in collusion with the investigating staff in name, by deceiving the victim, received 1.35 thousand won from the victim to the post office account in the F’s name, and such deception was transferred from the victim to the post office account in the F’s name, and all of the Defendant from December 3, 2013 to January 14, 2014, as indicated in the attached list of crimes (1).