beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2015.07.08 2015고정31

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 07:30 on August 31, 2014, the Defendant: (b) to receive KRW 300,000 from D, and (c) to E who is an employee, the Defendant said, “If you want to pay money by living in studio, 2 difference should be left. A sexual relationship is only one time; (b) the secondary cost cannot be paid by card, and (c) the Defendant said, “I accept 300,000 won directly from customers.”

E has been engaged in sexual intercourse with the above D at around 202 Gel 202 in South-gu, Nam-gu at the port of port around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of E, and partial statement of D;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. In an investigation report (Attachment to the Details of currency), the statement in the investigation agency and the court is relatively specific and consistent, and there seems to be no reason to make a false statement even when E is subject to criminal punishment due to sexual traffic, and in the absence of mediation by the defendant, the defendant who did not work together outside the three days after E was paid the price for sexual traffic from D and there seems to be no reason to communicate immediately after and after the control of this case (the defendant was completely discovered at the investigation agency about how there was any day after E had left the place with D, but the above statement is deemed to be false, and this seems to have arisen from the intent to conceal the crime of this case.

In full view of the facts, the credibility of the E’s statement and the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court is acknowledged as sufficient to arrange sexual traffic by having the Defendant conduct sexual intercourse with D. Accordingly, the allegation by the Defendant and the defense counsel denying this is without merit).

1. Article 19 (2) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment therefor;