2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

A. The Plaintiff was sentenced to imprisonment of three years and six months for committing a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (a brokerage business, etc.) and was confined in an Ansan prison on April 17, 2013, which became final and conclusive and conclusive, and was currently being confined in the second prison of the North Korean Peninsula.

B. On November 21, 2014, the Plaintiff, who was confined in the Ansan Prison, was subject to a disciplinary measure of 30 days of imprisonment with labor (hereinafter “instant measure”). On December 12, 2014, the Plaintiff requested the head of the Ansan Prison to disclose information, such as a work report, an examination book of the use of protective equipment, and the rules on the standards of legal facilities, but was subject to a disclosure, partial disclosure, non-disclosure, and non-existence decision (hereinafter “second disposition”) from the head of the Ansan Prison on January 6, 2015.

C. Accordingly, the plaintiff filed three administrative appeals against the defendant against the head of Ansan prison, and the details and the defendant's decision on them are as shown below.

(2) Each judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) each judgment of the court below is referred to as “non-acceptance” as described in the table; and (b) each judgment of the court below is added thereto; and (c) each judgment of the court below is referred to as “each judgment of the case”; and (d) May 20, 2015, the petition for revocation of the revocation of the first disposition of revocation of disciplinary action No. 1014, May 20, 2015, the petition for revocation of the second disposition, such as the rejection of information disclosure under subparagraph 7 of the first ruling of rejection of the appeal No. 2015, May 20, 2015, the part of the petition for appeal is dismissed on May 20, 2015; and (b) the third ruling of the court below’s rejection of the appeal on May 20, 2015; and (c) the purport of all the arguments and arguments as a whole.

2. Determination as to the legitimacy of the part concerning the claim for confirmation of illegality of omission among the lawsuit of this case

A. As to the Plaintiff’s seek confirmation that the omission that failed to conduct a hearing in the course of rendering each adjudication against the Defendant was illegal, the Defendant raised objection against the Plaintiff’s claim for administrative appeal.