The judgment below

Although examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal doctrine and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, even in light of the records, there was an error of law as alleged in the grounds of appeal by the court below, where the defendant's right to defense was infringed due to the infringement of private right such as perusal of trial records.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.