A. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) from October 2015 to July 2016, the two weeks registered C as the representative director; (b) operated C and D as a partnership business; and (c) E and F are D officers and employees of both countries.

At around 10:00 on August 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) went into the factory of the victim E (59) in the situation where there is a dispute over the ownership of nuclear power plants, etc. in the factory between C and the above D factories located in Yangju-si, and (b) went into the factory of the victim E (59) in order to restrain them; (c) laid down sand and gravel to the victim; (d) putting the victim with a net, putting the victim into the wall, putting the victim into the wall, and putting the victim into the entrance, resulting in the victim’s bodily injury, such as cerebrum, which requires medical treatment for about 20 days.

B. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge this part of the charges, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this.

① Under this law, F was aware that the victim inflicted an injury by assaulting the victim as stated in the facts charged by the Defendant.

Although the above statement is made by a person who is not the defendant, the above statement is a professional statement with the contents of the statement of another person who is not the defendant, since the defendant denies the crime, and it does not constitute a case where the injured person is unable to make a statement at the trial date as provided in Article 316 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and thus, it cannot be admitted as evidence as evidence.

② At an investigative agency, F considered the fact that the defendant was placed on the victim with his/her cell, and the victim was faced with his/her hair at the entrance by the victim.

Although this court stated, it did not seem to be what the defendant was at the time.