2. There are extenuating circumstances such as the Defendant’s confession and reflection of a crime, and the fact that the Defendant did not commit a crime for a considerable period after release.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, criminal records, criminal records, degree of damage, etc., including the Defendant’s crime of larceny committed several times by intrusion upon the Defendant’s residence by destroying the front door by using the front door, etc., and the amount of damage is extremely high, and two times the sentence was imposed due to the same kind of crime, and one time the suspended execution was served, the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court is too high, and thus, it cannot be said that the Defendant’s assertion is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.