If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government is a person who operates an open bond sales store in the name of "C" in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Around October 3, 2019, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “G” wholesale stores operated by the victim FF located in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan D market, “G,” the Defendant purchased a large number of ews in the future, and is expected to make cash settlement immediately after the purchase of ews. If the ews are supplied on credit, the Defendant would make a lump sum settlement on October 20, 2019.”

However, the Defendant did not have a plan to open marina business, and the Defendant did not normally pay the price for supply to other agricultural products suppliers due to the poor operation of the said “C” store directly operated by the Defendant. Therefore, even if the Defendant received on credit agricultural products from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the price normally until October 20, 2019.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received agricultural products worth KRW 667,00,00 in total from the victim on October 3, 2019, including 16 gamblings. From around that time to October 19, 201, the Defendant received agricultural products worth KRW 6,861,00 in total at the market price by the same method over 10 times, as indicated in the separate crime list, as shown in the separate crime list.

around December 20, 2018, the Defendant concluded that “Around December 20, 2018, the Defendant would pay the price without fail by the end of January 2019,” to the J, an employee of the said company, at the I Office operated by the Victim H in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.”

However, the Defendant had operated C stores at the time of the instant case. However, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the price in a normal manner, even if he received the cremation from the victim, as the fact that the Defendant had failed to pay the price for other goods due to the poor operation of the said store.

The Defendant, as above, JJ.