손해배상(기)
1. Of the part against Defendant G Co., Ltd. in the judgment of the court of first instance, the amount ordered to be paid additionally below.
1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (to use an abbreviation in the judgment of the court of first instance as it is), and citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420
2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant G G Co., Ltd.
A. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
B. (1) The scope of liability for damages: (a) the result of the appraisal by the appraiser of the trial, the result of the appraisal by the appraiser of the first instance trial, the result of the appraisal by the appraiser L, M, the result of the fact inquiry by the first instance L, the construction cost to be restored to the plaintiff's building is KRW 143,374,90, the construction cost to be restored to the plaintiff's building, KRW 6,178,661, and KRW 10% of the construction cost to be restored to the plaintiff's building even after the restoration to the plaintiff's building, and the damage amount is 81,40,000, the exchange value reduction is 81,40
In addition, it is recognized that the degree of contribution to the construction of this case to the damages of the plaintiff's building was 77.54%, and according to the above facts of recognition, the part of the plaintiff's damages borne by the defendant GG corporation is 179,081 won (=(6,178,61 won 6,178,661 won 81,40,000 won) x 77.54%, and less than won).
(2) The Plaintiff shall conduct a precise safety diagnosis to verify whether the restoration work was well performed after the restoration work was performed, and whether there is any risk to additional safety after the restoration work, and the cost is required to be 25,300,000 won, and thus, the amount calculated according to the degree of contribution to the excavation work of the newly constructed building of this case should also be included in the amount of damages. The Plaintiff asserted that the amount calculated according to the degree of contribution to the excavation work of this case should also be included in the amount of damages, and there is evidence corresponding thereto (not more than 67 pages of the appraisal report), but the above precise safety diagnosis must be implemented after the restoration work