The sentencing of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to confession of each of the instant crimes; (b) the Defendant committed a crime in favor of the Defendant; (c) the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment (30 times, such as violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, injury, obstruction of business, damage to property, etc.) on several occasions; (d) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes even after being subject to criminal punishment from around 10 to 10 times; (b) each of the instant crimes committed again; (c) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and fright against the victims without any particular reason; (d) the nature of the crime is not good; (e) the remaining victims did not reach an agreement with N, and (e) other various circumstances, such as the motive and circumstances of the instant crime; (e) the circumstances after the commission of the crime; (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, etc.; and (e) the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, such as the records and the environment.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no ground for appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.