However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 1, 2015, the Defendant, at around 18:00, sustained a dispute with the victim due to the malfunction of the construction cost set up in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Defendant’s residence, at around 608 Dong 1009, and the Defendant, at around 31 days before the victim D, sustained the injury of the victim’s left side her part of the bones of the body, which requires medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A written complaint, a written injury diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (a) (the fact that there exists a difference between the parties’ assertion and the circumstances of the case, and the degree of injury);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that the protection observation and the Criminal Act is more than 62-2 (in order to prevent any second offense);